Packaging performs important functions of containing, promoting and facilitating the storage and use of products, and could be treated as one of the most important factors influencing consumer’s purchase decision. However, packaging of processed food by small scale entrepreneurs is often insufficient to enhance competitiveness in the market. The objectives of this study were (i) to assess consumers’ perceptions on packaging attributes and (ii) to examine the influence of packaging related attributes on purchase decision of processed cereal products. The study enrolled 300 randomly selected consumers of food processed by women groups in Dodoma Municipality in 2014. A four-point Likert scale was used to rate food packaging attributes and the factors influencing purchase decision. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences program version 16. Results show that consumers acknowledge the benefits of packaging particularly in terms of product protection (mean score 3.4), hygiene (3.3), product information (3.1) and branding (3.1). These functions are considered important along with specific characteristics of packaging materials which include durability (3.0), good shape for grip (3.0), attractiveness (2.8), easy to open and close after use (2.6) and recyclability and degradability (1.8). On the other hand, the factors influencing buying decision span from the perceived value of the product to nutritional content and taste, product information and safety related attributes and appearance of the packaging materials. In conclusion, packaging affects preferences of food products and significantly influences purchase decision of the products. The findings from this study underscore the importance of packaging and packaging design for fulfilling the many functions related to logistics and marketing of food products. The main implication drawn from the study is that entrepreneurs need to be cognisant of consumers' specific packaging preferences for which they can use as a strategic marketing tool.
Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11 |
Page(s) | 77-81 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Packaging Attributes, Perceived Value, Purchase Decisions
[1] | Ampuero, O and Vila, N. 2006. Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(2), 100-112. |
[2] | Asadollahi, A and Givee, M. 2011. The Role of graphic design in packaging and sales of product in Iran. Contemporary Marketing Review, 1(5) 30 – 34. |
[3] | Banterle, A., Cavaliere, A and Ricci, E.C. 2012. Food labelled information: An empirical analysis of consumer preferences. International Journal of Food System Dynamics 3 (2), 156-170 |
[4] | Becker, L., van Rompay, T. J., Schifferstein, H. N and Galetzka, M. 2011. Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 22(1), 17-23. |
[5] | Coles, R and Kirwan, M. J. 2011. Food and beverage packaging technology, John Wiley and Sons. |
[6] | Creusen, M. E., Veryzer, R. W and Schoormans, J. P. 2010. Product value importance and consumer preference for visual complexity and symmetry. European Journal of Marketing, 44 (9/10), 1437-1452. |
[7] | Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K and Hult, G. T. M. 2000. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of retailing, 76(2), 193-218. |
[8] | Dunteman, G. E. 1989. Principal components analysis. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-069. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[9] | European Council. 1994. Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. Official Journal of the European Union. 31/12/1994; L365:0010 - 0023. |
[10] | Estiri, M., Hasangholi, T., Yazdani, H., Nejad, H. J and Rayej, H. 2010. Food products consumer behaviors: the role of packaging elements. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 535-543. |
[11] | Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics using SPSS, 3rd Edition. Sage publications |
[12] | Han, J. H. 2003. Anti-microbial food packaging. Novel food packaging techniques, 50-70. |
[13] | Kilcast, D and Subramaniam, P., eds. 2000. The stability and shelf-life of food. Elsevier. |
[14] | Kim, Y.T., Min, B and Kim, K.W. 2010. General characteristics of packaging materials for food system. In: Han, J.H, ed., Innovations in food packaging. Second Edition, pp 13-35 |
[15] | Kuvykaite, R., Dovaliene, A and Navickiene, L. 2009. Impact of package elements on consumer’s purchase decision, ISSN 1822-6515 |
[16] | Ladipo, P.K and Rahim, A.G. 2013. ''Packaging and the influence of information overload in a low-risk market: A study of grocery products" European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1(10), 61-72 |
[17] | Lamb, Charles. W., Hair, Joseph. F and Carl, Mcdaniel. 2004. "Marketing", 7th edition, Thomson, south-western, Canada. |
[18] | Lee, D. S., Yam, K. L and Piergiovanni, L. 2011. Food packaging science and technology. CRC press. |
[19] | Lifu, F. L. 2012. An analysis of the effect of product packaging on consumers’ buying choice in Calabar Municipality, Cross River State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 186-191. |
[20] | Macdonald, E. K and Sharp, B. M. 2000. Brand awareness effects on consumer decision making for a common, repeat purchase product: A Replication. Journal of business research, 48(1), 5-15. |
[21] | Mahalik, N. P and Nambiar, A. N. 2010. Trends in food packaging and manufacturing systems and technology. Trends in food science and technology, 21(3), 117-128. |
[22] | Manalili, N., Dorado, M and Otterdijk, R. 2011. Appropriate solutions food packaging solutions for developing countries. International congress, Interpack. Düsseldorf, Germany |
[23] | Marsh, K and Bugusu, B. 2007. Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues. Journal of Food Science, 72(3), 39-55 |
[24] | Memon, S. A. 2012. A study of women entrepreneurship development in Kolhapur city. Zenith International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research, 2(5), 12-22. |
[25] | Montero-Calderón, M., Rojas-Graü, M. A and Martín-Belloso, O. 2008. Effect of packaging conditions on quality and shelf-life of fresh-cut pineapple (Ananas comosus). Postharvest biology and technology, 50(2), 182-189. |
[26] | Mutsikiwa, M and Marumbwa, J. 2013. The impact of aesthetics package design elements oncConsumer purchase decisions: A case of locally produced dairy products in Southern Zimbabwe. Journal of Business Management, 8 (5), 67-71 |
[27] | Ogba, I. E and Johnson, R. 2010. How packaging affects the product preferences of children and the buyer behaviour of their parents in the food industry. Young Consumers, 11(1), 77-89. |
[28] | Peters-Texeira, A and Badrie, N. 2005. Consumers’ perception of food packaging in Trinidad, West Indies and its related impact on food choices. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 508-514 |
[29] | Pournis, N., Papavergou, A., Badeka, A., Kontominas, M. G and Savvaidis, I. N. 2005. Shelf-life extension of refrigerated Mediterranean mullet (Mullus surmuletus) using modified atmosphere packaging. Journal of Food Protection, 68 (10), 2201-2207. |
[30] | Richardson, P., Howarth, R and Finnegan, G. 2004. The challenges of growing small businesses: Insights from women entrepreneurs in Africa. Geneva: International Labour Office. |
[31] | Rita, K., Aiste D and Laura, N. 2009. Impact of package elements on consumer purchase, Journal of Economics and Management ,14, 441-447 |
[32] | Robertson, G. L. 2012. Food packaging: principles and practice. CRC press. |
[33] | Rundh, B. 2005. The multi-faceted dimension of packaging. British Food Journal, 107 (9), 670-684. |
[34] | Silayoi, P and Speece, M. 2004. Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. British Food Journal, 106 (8), 607-628. |
[35] | Silayoi, P and Speece, M. 2007. The importance of packaging attributes: a conjoint analysis approach. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1495- 1517. |
[36] | Smith, M. D and Brynjolfsson, E. 2001. Consumer decision making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(4), 541-558. |
[37] | Stoll, M., Baecke, S and Kenning, P. 2008. What they see is what they get? An fMRI study on neural correlates of attractive packaging. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(45), 342-359. |
[38] | Tambunan, T. 2009. Women entrepreneurship in Asian developing countries: Their development and main constraints. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 1(2), 27-40. |
[39] | Topoyan, M and Bulut, Z.A. 2008. Packaging value of cosmetic products: An insight from the view point of consumers. International conference on value chain sustainability. ICOVACS, pp 183-190. |
[40] | Underwood, R. L., Klein, N. M and Burke, R. R. 2001. Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(7), 403-422. |
[41] | United Republic of Tanzania. 2010. Supporting the Competitiveness of Food Processing in Tanzania Strategic Action Plan |
[42] | United Republic of Tanzania. 2013. Population and housing census. National Bureau of Statistics (Tanzania). |
[43] | Venter, K., van der Merwe, D., de Beer, H., Kempen, E and Bosman, M. 2011. Consumers' perceptions of food packaging: an exploratory investigation in Potchefstroom, South Africa. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(3), 273-281. |
[44] | Wang, E. 2013. The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 41(10), 805-816. |
[45] | Weileng, L. 2010. Msc Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia |
[46] | Wells, L. E., Farley, H and Armstrong, G. A. 2007. The importance of packaging design for own-label food brands. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 35 (9), 677-690. |
APA Style
Sarah Mmari, John Safari, James Lwelamira. (2015). Consumers’ Perceptions on Packaging of Processed Food Products in Dodoma Municipality, Tanzania. Social Sciences, 4(4), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11
ACS Style
Sarah Mmari; John Safari; James Lwelamira. Consumers’ Perceptions on Packaging of Processed Food Products in Dodoma Municipality, Tanzania. Soc. Sci. 2015, 4(4), 77-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11
AMA Style
Sarah Mmari, John Safari, James Lwelamira. Consumers’ Perceptions on Packaging of Processed Food Products in Dodoma Municipality, Tanzania. Soc Sci. 2015;4(4):77-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11
@article{10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11, author = {Sarah Mmari and John Safari and James Lwelamira}, title = {Consumers’ Perceptions on Packaging of Processed Food Products in Dodoma Municipality, Tanzania}, journal = {Social Sciences}, volume = {4}, number = {4}, pages = {77-81}, doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20150404.11}, abstract = {Packaging performs important functions of containing, promoting and facilitating the storage and use of products, and could be treated as one of the most important factors influencing consumer’s purchase decision. However, packaging of processed food by small scale entrepreneurs is often insufficient to enhance competitiveness in the market. The objectives of this study were (i) to assess consumers’ perceptions on packaging attributes and (ii) to examine the influence of packaging related attributes on purchase decision of processed cereal products. The study enrolled 300 randomly selected consumers of food processed by women groups in Dodoma Municipality in 2014. A four-point Likert scale was used to rate food packaging attributes and the factors influencing purchase decision. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences program version 16. Results show that consumers acknowledge the benefits of packaging particularly in terms of product protection (mean score 3.4), hygiene (3.3), product information (3.1) and branding (3.1). These functions are considered important along with specific characteristics of packaging materials which include durability (3.0), good shape for grip (3.0), attractiveness (2.8), easy to open and close after use (2.6) and recyclability and degradability (1.8). On the other hand, the factors influencing buying decision span from the perceived value of the product to nutritional content and taste, product information and safety related attributes and appearance of the packaging materials. In conclusion, packaging affects preferences of food products and significantly influences purchase decision of the products. The findings from this study underscore the importance of packaging and packaging design for fulfilling the many functions related to logistics and marketing of food products. The main implication drawn from the study is that entrepreneurs need to be cognisant of consumers' specific packaging preferences for which they can use as a strategic marketing tool.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Consumers’ Perceptions on Packaging of Processed Food Products in Dodoma Municipality, Tanzania AU - Sarah Mmari AU - John Safari AU - James Lwelamira Y1 - 2015/06/23 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 77 EP - 81 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.11 AB - Packaging performs important functions of containing, promoting and facilitating the storage and use of products, and could be treated as one of the most important factors influencing consumer’s purchase decision. However, packaging of processed food by small scale entrepreneurs is often insufficient to enhance competitiveness in the market. The objectives of this study were (i) to assess consumers’ perceptions on packaging attributes and (ii) to examine the influence of packaging related attributes on purchase decision of processed cereal products. The study enrolled 300 randomly selected consumers of food processed by women groups in Dodoma Municipality in 2014. A four-point Likert scale was used to rate food packaging attributes and the factors influencing purchase decision. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences program version 16. Results show that consumers acknowledge the benefits of packaging particularly in terms of product protection (mean score 3.4), hygiene (3.3), product information (3.1) and branding (3.1). These functions are considered important along with specific characteristics of packaging materials which include durability (3.0), good shape for grip (3.0), attractiveness (2.8), easy to open and close after use (2.6) and recyclability and degradability (1.8). On the other hand, the factors influencing buying decision span from the perceived value of the product to nutritional content and taste, product information and safety related attributes and appearance of the packaging materials. In conclusion, packaging affects preferences of food products and significantly influences purchase decision of the products. The findings from this study underscore the importance of packaging and packaging design for fulfilling the many functions related to logistics and marketing of food products. The main implication drawn from the study is that entrepreneurs need to be cognisant of consumers' specific packaging preferences for which they can use as a strategic marketing tool. VL - 4 IS - 4 ER -