Volume 7, Issue 4, December 2019, Page: 135-140
Forms and Figures of the Sensitive: The Question of Science and Technology
Anselmo Orlando Pinto, Post/Graduate Department at the Faculty of Ethics, Humanities and Legal Sciences of the University of Saint Thomas of Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique
Received: Jul. 19, 2019;       Accepted: Sep. 16, 2019;       Published: Oct. 14, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijp.20190704.11      View  75      Downloads  21
Abstract
Figure is the idea one has of the world, whereas form is the totality of determinations, it is the essence in its phenomenal manifestation. Human knowledge takes three forms, that is, ordinary, scientific and philosophical. In the ordinary form men can have knowledge without recourse to particular wits; in scientific form knowledge is organized and disciplined and seeks to establish constant relations between phenomena, in the last instance, in the philosophical form knowledge has the characteristic of offering ultimate explanations to all phenomena. The split between science and philosophy that began in the seventeenth century with Descartes's dissociation between the thinking/self, the ego cogitans, and the material thing, the extended Res, creates a tragic problem in science: science is not known, does not have the self-reflective ability. This drama also concerns philosophy, which, no longer being empirically nourished, suffered the agony of the philosophy of nature and the failure of the philosophy of life; There was as much extralucidity in Husserl when he diagnosed the crisis of scientific knowledge as metaphysical delusion, stratospheric evasion in the idea of "transcendental ego." This study is articulated in three points 1) figures and forms of sensitive2) science, technique and technology and 3) Cultural meaning of technologies.
Keywords
Form, Figure, Knowledge, Science, Technique
To cite this article
Anselmo Orlando Pinto, Forms and Figures of the Sensitive: The Question of Science and Technology, International Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 7, No. 4, 2019, pp. 135-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20190704.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
BACHELARD, G (2005). The formation of the scientific spirit. Contribution to a psychoanalysis of knowledge. Counterpoint Publisher, Rio de Janeiro.
[2]
ABBAGNANO, N (2007). Philosophy Dictionary, Ed. Magazine, Lisbon.
[3]
MONDIN, B (2006). Philosophical Anthropology. ESD, Bologna.
[4]
TOLLE, O (2007). Aesthetic light: science of the Baumgarten sensitive between art and illumination (Dissertation). USP, Sao Paulo.
[5]
DOS SANTOS D, COSTA F (2012). “Art as Proof of Human Immanence: A Dialogue with Lukács's Prologue to Aesthetics I”. In José Albio Saleswoman -Dinamara Garcia Feldens (Org). Art and philosophy in the mediation of formative experiences. UECE Publishing House, Fortaleza.
[6]
MONDIN B (1980). The man, who is he? Paulus, Sao Paulo.
[7]
COCCO R (2006). “The Question of Technique in Martin Heidegger”. Controversy Magazine. Volume 2. no 1.
[8]
MORIN, E (2005). Science with consciousness. Bertrand Brazil, Rio de Janeiro.
[9]
SILVEIRA F, BAZZO A (s/a). “Science and Technology: Transforming the Relationship of Human Being with the World”. In Technology and Civilization, Paraná.
[10]
MANZONI, G (2004). The technology of the back. Queriniana, Brescia.
[11]
Science Foundation Ireland (2015). An analysis of the Irish Public-s perceptions and awareness of STEM in Society. Dublin. Available at: https://www.sfi.ie/resources/SFI-Science-in-Ireland-Barometer.pdf
[12]
Innovation and creativity - Cambridge International. Available at: https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/426483-chapter-4-innovation-and-creativity.pdf
[13]
National Institutes of Health (2018). Doing Science: The process of Inquiry. Available at: http://www.uwyo.edu/scienceposse/resources/nih_doing-science.pdf
[14]
Department of Education & Communities (2015). Guide to Application Writing for Classroom Teacher Positions. Available at: https://www.teach.nsw.edu.au/documents/app_guide.pdf
[15]
OECD (2016). Measuring Science, Technology and Innovation. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/sti/STI-Stats-Brochure.pdf
[16]
National Committees for Research Ethics in Norway (2009). Risk and Uncertainty as a research Ethics Challenge. Norway. Available at: https://www.etikkom.no/Aktuelt/publikasjoner/Risk-and-Uncertainty---as-a-Research-Ethics-Challenge
[17]
BHATTCHERJEE, A (2012). Social Science Research> Principles, Methods, and Practices. USF, USA. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=oa_textbooks
[18]
European Commission (2007). Integrating science in society issues in scientific research. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/integrating-sis-issues-in-research-main-findings_en.pdf
[19]
Alberta Education (2014). Science Grades 7/8/9. Program of studies. Available at: https://education.alberta.ca/media/3069389/pos_science_7_9.pdf
Browse journals by subject